Semantic segmentation models for rangeland degradation are routinely ranked by Dice similarity, yet the Dice coefficient is a prevalence-dependent statistic whose behaviour under class-imbalance shift is rarely characterised before deployment. the present analysis treats Dice reliability as a design property rather than a post hoc observation. We formalise degradation segmentation as a pixel-level decision problem over a four-class label space (non-degraded, moderately degraded, severely degraded, bare ground) and derive the sampling distribution of the per-class Dice coefficient under a declared variance structure. A replication-based evaluation of the before-after-control-impact estimator was conducted with between-cluster SD = 6.0, residual SD = 4.5 and intraclass correlation = 0.640, across 2000 design cells spanning cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points.52 clusters are required to detect a 5 percentage point shift at 80% power, and that the minimum detectable effect falls steeply between 8 and 24 clusters before flattening. Dice reliability is therefore not a fixed attribute of a segmentation architecture but a function of the cluster budget allocated to its validation. We propose a reliability contract that binds reported Dice to the imbalance regime and cluster count under which it was estimated, and we specify the boundary conditions under which the contract is informative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sowe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: