Background As whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly used in clinical and public health contexts, clearer expectations regarding the amount of variation present in the “average” human genome are required to contextualise findings. Methods We analysed WGS data from two large population cohorts: 490,541 individuals in UK Biobank (UKB) and 414,830 individuals in All of Us. Following variant and genotype QC, we aimed to assess the range of neutral and disease-associated variation across six genetically-inferred ancestry groups. Results The “average” genome contains ~4.3–5.3 million variants, of which ~1.5% are rare (within-cohort allele frequency < 1%). This includes ~67 autosomal deletions/duplications > 10,000 basepairs per genome, and rare autosomal copy number variants > 1 Mb present in ~ 1 in 41 (2.5%) individuals. On average, ~32–42% of variants per person are homozygous and individuals have ~4 unique runs of homozygosity > 1.5 Mb, with marked variation observed across ancestry groups. Of the ~21– 26,000 SNVs/indels per person in coding exons of MANE Select transcripts, ~48% are predicted to alter the protein, of which ~0.8% are high-confidence loss-of-function and ~0.1% have REVEL score > 0.7 suggestive of pathogenicity. Depending upon parental age, the average genome contains ~63 de novo variants, of which ~75–80% are paternal in origin. Considering only rare variants in GenCC-curated monogenic disease-associated genes, the average genome contains ~1–3 ClinVar pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, ~2–5 high-confidence loss-of-function variants, and ~50 ClinVar variants of uncertain significance. Most ClinVar pathogenic variants are heterozygous in recessive disease genes, consistent with carrier status, and have multiple ClinVar submitters. Finally, applying polygenic scores (PGS) for 28 common diseases within UKB, we estimate that the average person is in the top 10% for ~3 conditions, and around 1 in 5 people are in the top 1% for at least one PGS. Conclusions The ubiquity of genetic variation in individuals has important implications for policy-makers considering genomic screening and clinicians counselling families. The continued underrepresentation of many global populations reflects a broader limitation of contemporary genomic research, underscoring the need for more inclusive datasets worldwide in order to enable equitable precision medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wright et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: