To promote the application of asphalt concrete with acidic aggregates in pumped-storage power stations and clarify its damage evolution and crack propagation mechanisms under extreme temperature-difference cycling, low-temperature direct tensile tests were conducted using digital image correlation, with alkaline aggregate asphalt concrete as the reference. The temperature-difference influence factor was introduced to quantify the degree of performance degradation of asphalt concrete under temperature-difference cycling, and in combination with analysis of variance revealed the influence patterns of multiple factors and their interactions on low-temperature mechanical behavior. Based on macroscopic performance indicators and the main-crack characteristic width ratio, a cross-scale synergistic damage model was constructed, elucidating how aggregate lithology governs interfacial adhesion and stress-transfer mechanisms across macroscopic and mesoscopic scales. Results indicate that, under temperature-difference cycling, the performance degradation process of asphalt concrete can be divided into three stages: thermal stress microdamage, hardening-damage interaction, and cumulative fatigue failure, and the plastic-to-brittle transition temperature shifted from −30 ℃ to −20 ℃. Analysis of variance indicates that temperature is the primary factor controlling changes in peak stress and peak strain, with contribution rates of 67.64% and 74.74% During the plastic failure stage (0 −60 cycles), granite asphalt concrete exhibits distinct transverse bands of high strain concentration. Crack initiation is strongly oriented toward the aggregate-asphalt interface. In contrast, the limestone aggregate-asphalt interface efficiently transfers stress and suppresses uncontrolled crack propagation because of its strong interfacial adhesion. The research results can provide a solid scientific basis for enabling the use of locally sourced materials in engineering and for the safe and widespread application of acidic aggregates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: