Irrigation-water allocation models in computer agriculture routinely estimate the indirect effect of allocation decisions on crop yield through root-zone moisture, but the mediator is only partially observed: percolation below the root zone is unmeasured in most field deployments, so the mediator is a coarse proxy. the present analysis derives an interventional-identifiability bound for the natural indirect effect of irrigation allocation on yield when the mediator is subject to unobserved percolation. The bound is expressed as a closed-form interval whose width depends on the fraction of mediator variance attributable to percolation and on the strength of the allocation-mediator association. A before-after-control-impact design was evaluated across 2000 replications per cell for cluster counts of 8, 16, 24, 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points, under a declared variance structure with between-cluster SD of 6.0, residual SD of 4.5 and intraclass correlation of 0.64. The design required 52 clusters to detect a 5 percentage-point effect at 80% power. The bound is shown to be sharp when percolation is independent of allocation and to widen monotonically as the percolation share of mediator variance increases. The contribution is a formal statement of what mediation claims remain defensible when the root-zone mediator is only partially observed, together with the design conditions under which those claims can be tested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Warsame et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: