This study investigates the effects of mechanically-thermally activated pretreated electrolytic manganese residue (AEMR) on P·I 42.5 cement. Activation mechanism, workability, mechanical properties, hydration heat, kinetics, leaching toxicity, and sustainability were systematically evaluated. Mechanical activation leads to a reduction in particle size, while thermal treatment at 700°C promotes dehydration, dehydroxylation, and the formation of an amorphous phase, thus improving pozzolanic activity. The optimal activation condition is determined as 3 h of ball milling followed by calcination at 700°C for 1 h based on mortar fluidity, strength, hydration characteristics, leaching safety, and sustainability. Mortars incorporating up to 10% AEMR exhibit improved fluidity and 28 d compressive strength exceeding 50 MPa, which is slightly lower than that of P·I 42.5 cement. Both BM3 (ball milling for 3 h) and BM3-C7 (BM3 calcination at 700°C for 1 h) prolong the hydration induction period and reduce cumulative heat release. BM3 shows retarded early hydration but higher ultimate hydration heat (Q max ) due to the micro-aggregate filling effect and sufficient late-age pozzolanic reaction. Whereas BM3-C7 accelerates early hydration, characterized by higher rate constants, shorter t 50 , and a smoother phase transition, owing to the rapid reaction between anhydrite and reactive aluminosilicates. All samples follow the NG-I-D kinetic mechanism identified by the Krstulovic-Dabic model. Leaching tests confirm negligible heavy metal and NH 4 + leaching. The optimized mixtures lead to a reduction in carbon emissions by around 9%, a decrease in material costs by approximately 6%, and a 10% reduction in clinker usage, offering a sustainable approach for the large-scale EMR utilization in low-carbon cementitious materials. However, the parameters for industrial thermal activation and the long-term durability of AEMR cement necessitate further optimization and validation in field conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: