Village grain reserve committees in Niger are formally accountable to village assemblies through petition-based recall, yet the signature threshold that triggers a recall vote is rarely treated as a sociological variable in its own right. Drawing on institutional sociology, the sociology of organisations, and the literature on decentralised natural-resource governance in the Sahel, the paper specifies a regression discontinuity design in which the running variable is the share of registered assembly signatures collected and the cutoff is the constitutional recall threshold. The framework proposes that households anticipating a credible recall threat reduce precautionary cereal stocks and increase market re-sale, and that this effect should be discontinuous at the threshold. The paper also reports descriptive statistics from a real DHS Program indicator on breastfeeding children receiving foods made from grains across 33 African countries between 2005 and 2020 (N = 65 country-survey observations, mean = 49.711, SD = 12.65), which is used only to characterise the regional cereal-consumption context within which Nigerien village reserves operate. No causal estimate is reported; the contribution is a testable sociological specification linking petition thresholds to household divestment from collective reserves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viegas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: