This article focuses on two of Mrinal Sen’s later films, Khandhar (1983) and Antareen (1993), to argue that a ‘ruin aesthetic’ coalesces in his oeuvre in response to the political transformations of his time. While most scholars read Sen’s family dramas as a retreat from the radical politics of the 1960s and 1970s, I suggest, instead, that, going beyond discourses of disappointment and despair often associated with the collapse of the global Left, Sen’s late films reorient us to a new articulation of political via his figuration of ruins. Sen imbues the debris of monumental physical structures with a different conceptualisation of history and the past. In the spatiotemporal configuration of the ruin, history is palpable only as fragments, but these shards potentiate a different future. The figure of the woman – aligned with the ruin – is a key vector through which old certitudes are abandoned and new possibilities imagined in the films in question.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meheli Sen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: