Off-policy evaluation (OPE) of irrigation scheduling policies is complicated by unobserved evapotranspiration (ET) feedback: the same soil-moisture state that a policy acts upon is also shaped by the policy's own past actions, so that the logging distribution and the target distribution differ in ways that standard importance-sampling estimators cannot correct. The bound is derived under a sequential ignorability assumption conditional on a proxy for ET, and it is shown to be sharp when the proxy is informative and to degrade gracefully when it is not. The derivation yields a finite-sample concentration inequality that accounts for the variance of the importance weights and the bias of the outcome model, and it produces a computable upper bound on the mean squared error of the OPE estimate. The bound is illustrated with a reanalysis of a public reanalysis dataset for Nairobi, Kenya (2000–2023, 312 monthly observations), in which the mean temperature is 20.146 °C and the warming trend is 0.2477 °C per decade; these values are used to parameterise the ET proxy and to show how the bound responds to a realistic warming signal. The contribution is a computer-science result: a bound that is tight enough to be useful in practice, computable from logged data alone, and explicit about the conditions under which OPE of irrigation policies can be trusted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ntuli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: