Rebelo, A, Ripley, N, Weakley, J, and Comfort, P. Relationships between isometric belt squat force and vertical jump performance across knee joint angles. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between vertical jump performance and isometric belt squat force assessed at 2 knee joint angles (120° and 90°) and to compare outcomes across age groups in male and female athletes. One hundred and twenty subjects (20.3 ± 6.5 years, 1.77 ± 0.12 m, 71.0 ± 13.3 kg) performed countermovement jumps, squat jumps, and isometric belt squat tests at 120° and 90° on dual force platforms. Between-group differences were analyzed using 1-way or Welch's analysis of variance with Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc analyses. Associations were examined using Pearson's correlations with Bonferroni-adjusted significance thresholds ( p < 0.002), while omnibus tests used corrected alpha levels where applicable. Isometric belt squat net peak force demonstrated weak-to-moderate associations with jump height across tasks ( r = 0.36–0.55). Associations between net force at 200 milliseconds and jump height were moderate at 90° ( r = 0.45–0.52), whereas net force at 100 milliseconds showed negligible associations to jump height. Older athletes produced significantly higher absolute isometric net peak force than younger groups only at 90° knee flexion (up to ∼860 N difference), with moderate-to-large effects ( g = 0.67–0.80), whereas relative net peak force did not differ between age categories. These findings indicate that the isometric belt squat can be confidently used to monitor maximal lower-limb force capacity across knee angles, with the 90° position offering greater sensitivity for distinguishing strength levels between age groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rebelo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: