Contact-tracing prioritisation algorithms for tuberculosis (TB) in community clinics must allocate scarce screening resources across households whose stigma-reporting behaviour is systematically unmeasured. The dataset comprises 109 country-survey observations from 35 African countries between 1990 and 2023, with a mean of 9.018 and a standard deviation of 12.67. The paper proves that when household stigma reporting is missing not at random, standard prioritisation rules violate a fairness guarantee defined as equalised tracing yield across reporting strata. A bound is derived on the fairness gap as a function of the unmeasured reporting bias, and a robust prioritisation rule is proposed that satisfies the guarantee under stated assumptions. The framework is evaluated analytically rather than empirically; no original data were collected. The contribution is a formal characterisation of when AI-driven TB contact-tracing prioritisation can be certified fair under unmeasured stigma reporting, and a decision rule that clinics can use to test whether their prioritisation is certifiable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obame et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: