Urban redevelopment in Lagos routinely removes informal footbridges that women traders use to move between residential settlements and periodic markets, yet the consequences for market-circuit formation are rarely specified in a form that supports causal estimation. The design is motivated by a mechanism in which demolition raises the effective distance between residence and market, shifts the gender division of transport labour, and re-routes traders through intermediaries whose margins alter the viability of repeated visits. Identification rests on comparing settlements on opposite sides of a demolished bridge with settlements on comparable corridors where a bridge remained standing, before and after demolition, with exposure defined by pre-demolition pedestrian flow rather than by post-hoc outcomes. The paper specifies the treatment, comparison, outcome and covariate structure, states the parallel-trends assumption and the threats to it, and sets out the event-study and heterogeneity specifications that would permit estimation. It does not report estimates. The contribution is a falsifiable design for a question that Lagos redevelopment policy has so far posed only descriptively, and a set of boundary conditions under which the design would and would not identify the effect of interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tunde Adewale Ogunbanjo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: