Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication of surgery and anesthesia, with an incidence of 4–5% in elective procedures. POUR is traditionally managed with bladder catheterization, which carries risks of infection, urethral trauma, and prolonged hospitalization. Pharmacologic alternatives such as alpha-adrenergic antagonists or cholinergic agonists have been trialed, but with variable efficacy. Neostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, enhances parasympathetic activity to promote detrusor contraction and may represent a noninvasive treatment option, although its use in POUR is rarely reported. We report the case of a 73-year-old male with a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), bladder cancer status-post transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), and interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, who presented for magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided transperineal prostate biopsy. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia and tolerated without complication. Postoperatively, the patient developed acute urinary retention with a bladder volume of 565 mL that persisted for over 5 h despite ambulation, caffeine, and tamsulosin administration. Wishing to avoid catheterization, the patient elected to trial neostigmine after a risk-benefit-alternatives discussion. A 0.5 mg intravenous injection of neostigmine was administered. Complete voiding occurred within 20 min after the injection without adverse hemodynamic effects, and the patient was discharged home promptly. This case illustrates a temporal association between neostigmine administration and resolution of POUR; a single case cannot establish efficacy or causation. Postoperative urinary retention developed in a patient with multiple risk factors for POUR after MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy and persisted despite conservative management. A single 0.5 mg intravenous dose of neostigmine resulted in complete bladder emptying within 20 min, avoiding bladder catheterization without adverse effects. This case describes neostigmine administration in a carefully monitored patient with established postoperative urinary retention and warrants further prospective investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: