To compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), mean apparent propagator (MAP), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) in grading pediatric intracranial tumors (PITs). Forty-four patients with PITs (mean age 8.39 ± 4.17 years; 18 males) who underwent DWI and diffusion spectrum imaging (DTI, DKI, MAP, and NODDI) were enrolled, and classified into 23 low-grade and 21 high-grade PITs. Diffusion metrics were compared between the low- and high-grade PITs using the Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Spearman correlations were performed. Sensitivity analysis was performed in 27 pediatric gliomas. The MAP_MSD (mean squared diffusion), MAP_QIV (q-space inverse variance), and DWI_ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient) values were significantly lower, while MAP_NG (non-gaussianity), MAP_NGAx (axial non-gaussianity), MAP_NGRad (radial non-gaussianity), NODDI_ICVF (intracellular volume fraction), and NODDI_ODI (orientation dispersion index) were significantly higher in high-grade PITs than in low-grade PITs ( p < 0.05). All parameters yielded AUCs (areas under the ROC curves) of 0.72–0.82. NODDI_ICVF achieved the highest diagnostic performance for distinguishing PIT grades (AUC = 0.82, p < 0.001), with significant integrated discrimination improvement over DWI (corrected p < 0.05). Sensitivity analysis showed the robustness of MAP parameters in pediatric glioma grading, with favorable efficiency (AUC = 0.75–0.82). Furthermore, MAP, NODDI, and DWI metrics exhibited significant correlations with the Ki-67 index. MAP and NODDI have comparable diagnostic performance to DWI in PIT grading, and may provide new approaches for selecting therapeutic strategies for PITs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: