Membrane profiling and near-membrane spacers modify concentration polarization by altering fluid flow and the membrane–solution interface. This study examines their combined influence using a two-dimensional Nernst–Planck–Poisson–Navier–Stokes model with a voltage ramp of 5 mV/s. The geometries comprise a smooth membrane without spacers, a profiled membrane without spacers, and six wing arrangements adjacent to a profiled membrane. The feed concentration is 0.01 mol/m3, the protrusion radius is 0.5 mm, and the center-to-center pitch is 1.5 mm. Current data from five identifiable model files are compared over a common interval up to 1.2 V using a dimensionless domain-integrated current. Wing placement affects the current response, while profiling increases the geometric membrane contour by 28.54%. An analytical reference limiting current is calculated using the Levêque equation. The comparison with published three-dimensional results provides qualitative support for the transport mechanism. Systematic numerical uncertainty assessment, quantitative three-dimensional validation, geometry optimization, and energy comparisons at equal salt removal are identified as further research beyond the scope of the present study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Овсянникова et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: