Reliable operation of vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) requires more than detecting individual falsified messages: misbehaving vehicles must be identified over time, excluded from privileged roles such as cluster head, and prevented from degrading routing performance. This paper presents TAS-VANET, a trust-aware clustering and misbehavior management architecture that couples (i) a weighted clustering scheme (WCS) for stable cluster-head election, (ii) a per-vehicle trust model updated by detector verdicts, and (iii) a compact supervised sparse autoencoder (SAE) with a skip connection, whose hyperparameters are tuned by the Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA). The detection component is validated on a public consolidation of the VeReMi Extension benchmark (88,029 records, 17 attack variants) under sender-disjoint 10-fold cross-validation, reaching a mean F1 of 0.8831 (held-out test F1 \(=\) 0.9036); WOA tuning contributes \(+9.34\) F1 points over the default-configured SAE (one-sided Wilcoxon \(p=9.77× {10}⁻⁴\) , paired across identical folds). The integrated system is evaluated in OMNeT + + /SUMO against two trust-based clustering protocols (TACR and QMM-VANET): at 195 vehicles TAS-VANET attains a packet delivery ratio of 89.0%, exceeding TACR by 2.0 percentage points and QMM-VANET by 14.0 percentage points (18.7% relative), with the margin over TACR widening from 2.0 to 3.5 percentage points at 90 km/h; deploying the tuned rather than the default configuration lowers end-to-end delay by 14.3% at the 10% malicious-vehicle ratio. We additionally report two transparent negative findings: strong tabular ensembles remain competitive per-message detectors on this benchmark, and constant-position-offset attacks are essentially undetectable from single-message kinematics alone (AUC \(≈ \) 0.529), which we frame as an open research problem. All reported values trace to released simulation and training artifacts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdulkadhim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: