The rapid growth of machine-learning architectures has shifted an important engineering challenge from model development to selecting the most suitable trained candidate for a specific deployment context. This study proposes the System-Aware Model Selection (SMS) Framework, implemented through the Deployment-Aware Model Selection Algorithm (DAMSA), as a three-layer post-training decision architecture integrating risk-to-criterion mapping, candidate control, reference ranking, and robustness analysis. Across five engineering scenarios, DAMSA-SMS was compared with benchmark-oriented and conventional decision procedures under common candidate evidence and priority assumptions. Conventional multi-criteria procedures generally agreed on the nominal reference winner, but DAMSA-SMS revealed different levels of decision robustness. YOLOv7 was selected for traffic monitoring and pharmaceutical inspection with first-rank acceptabilities of 92.8% and 91.2%, respectively. In defense surveillance, YOLOv8s was preferred to the highest-mAP YOLOv11s because its Precision was 18.9 percentage points higher. YOLOv8s was Pareto-unique and preference-stable in microplastics detection. In CCPP monitoring, Random Forest was preferred under the Testing-Generalization profile, with the decision switching below a 12.99% Generalization Stability weight. Removing F1-score did not change any vision recommendation. These results show that nominal ranking agreement does not necessarily imply deployment robustness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: