Low-cost metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) electronic noses often combine resistance-ratio (Rs/R0) normalization with a humidity transducer, both from the outset, so neither is measured. We isolate each on a three-sensor MQ array across nine pure headspaces. On one device the voltage-to-resistance step is monotone, so on 245 trials with per-trial clean-air baselines, the whole effect is the R0 division: it cost a random forest 3.8 percentage points (seed-sweep interval 2.3–5.3) and linear models 8–9 points, possibly inflated by incomplete baseline recovery, and left the dominant error mode, a symmetric glycerol–water confusion, untouched. In-chamber humidity, from a channel withheld from the classifier, points to a physical rather than signal-conditioning origin. Admitting humidity as a fourth feature raises accuracy from 90.2 to 99.3% (450 trials, ten seeds, p < 10−8) and from 86.7 to 93.3% under a cross-day holdout; temperature and equivalent CO2 (eCO2) do not. A leave-one-sensor-out test shows MQ-9 adds 0.89 ± 0.63 points on three channels and nothing with humidity admitted, so two MOS channels and humidity suffice here. The contribution is the matched ablation, not the accuracy: we propose, for MOS arrays sampling aqueous preparations, adding a transducer for the interferent rather than transforming channels that cannot resolve it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nambi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: