Psychological prediction, the ability to infer human behavior and intentions, is essential for artificial intelligence and human–machine interaction. Existing deep learning models often rely on surface-level fitting and lack structured abductive interpretability, while traditional neuro-symbolic systems suffer from non-differentiable discontinuities and limited adaptability to dynamic contextual constraints. This paper proposes a neuro-symbolic automated reasoning framework for modeling latent cognitive states under contextual constraints. The framework introduces a context-aware adaptive SMC resampling operator (CAR-SMC), which uses energy-based penalties to filter hypotheses violating contextual constraints. We further design an executable differentiable program synthesis (EDPS) module and a hybrid iterative program–cognition interaction (HIPCI) mechanism. Through stop-gradient-based directional optimization, HIPCI separates the update pathways of belief and program representations during alternating fixed-point optimization, reducing circular gradient entanglement. Experiments on OpenToM and FANToM show that the framework improves the abductive consistency rate (ACR), an empirical belief–action consistency metric, to 70.8% and 52.1%, respectively. Under the adopted classification-oriented evaluation setup, these results indicate additional ACR gains over pure fine-tuned encoder classifiers and higher ACR than the evaluated few-shot ToT reference baseline (~ 7B), while using fewer parameters and maintaining an average inference latency of 215 ms per instance. Overall, this work provides a differentiable framework for machine Theory of Mind with process-level structural interpretability under the evaluated text-based classification setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fanjie Xu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: