Background Persistent muscular deficits are a major contributor to functional limitations following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are increasingly adopted to improve postoperative outcomes, their influence on mid-term objective muscle strength recovery remains insufficiently defined. This study aimed first, to determine whether a modified ERAS protocol enhances mid-term recovery of knee muscle strength after primary TKA and second, compare associated clinical outcomes using validated functional and patient-reported measures. Methods The study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the University of Regensburg, Germany (Reference No. 19-1470-101 on 31 July 2019) and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. In this prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial, 58 patients undergoing primary TKA were assigned to either a modified ERAS protocol ( n = 31) or conventional perioperative care ( n = 27). Assessments were conducted at 5 days, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Isokinetic muscle strength - including peak torque (Nm), total work (J), and power (W) - was measured using the Biodex ® System 3 Dynamometer. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Results At 5 days postoperatively, the ERAS group demonstrated significantly higher isokinetic muscle strength and improved active knee flexion compared to the conventional group ( p < 0.05). These early differences decreased over time, with no significant differences observed between groups at 3, 6, or 12 months. Both groups demonstrated excellent mid-term outcomes, with similarly high patient satisfaction and comparable PROMs and KOOS scores at the one-year follow-up. Conclusion The modified ERAS protocol led to significantly improved early postoperative recovery of knee muscle strength without adversely affecting short- or mid-term outcomes. Although isokinetic and clinical measures aligned across groups over time, the ERAS approach appears to be a safe and effective strategy for enhancing early functional recovery and overall patient experience following primary TKA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Götz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: