We study scalar nonparametric regression with a probability-measure-valued predictor observed along a dependent time series. A Nadaraya–Watson smoother localizes directly in the quadratic Wasserstein metric. The revised theory separates generic functional-kernel arguments from contributions generated by Wasserstein predictor geometry and local recurrence. We introduce an aggregate local-recurrence condition that is weaker than pairwise anti-clustering and is compatible with strongly overlapping empirical-distribution windows. For one-dimensional Gaussian location–scale predictors, we obtain an exact Euclidean small-ball expansion; we then extend the geometry to nonsingular multivariate Gaussian predictors through the Bures–Wasserstein Riemannian metric, obtaining an explicit local dimension and small-ball exponent. Under geometric strong mixing, local Hölder smoothness, and small-ball regularity, we establish strong consistency, an almost-sure rate, a variance expansion, and a triangular-array central limit theorem. We further derive a local long-run-variance CLT, a finite-dimensional joint CLT for several Wasserstein targets, and simultaneous confidence intervals. Feasible inference uses a direct Bartlett–HAC estimator whose consistency is now justified by an explicit fourth-order local cumulant condition rather than by geometric mixing alone. For tuning, we introduce an empirical small-ball admissibility screen and allow selection from a possibly growing grid on a separated chronological block. A truncation extension handles locally unbounded responses. Simulations satisfy the stated bounded-response assumptions and stress-test overlapping windows. The Mauna Loa CO2 illustration adds interpolation, window/horizon, and deterministic-overlap sensitivity, stationarity diagnostics, coefficient intervals, and a stronger AIC-selected autoregressive comparator. The latter can outperform the Wasserstein smoother, so the application is interpreted as an empirical illustration rather than evidence of universal predictive superiority.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bouabsa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: