This study extends an existing single-period mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) formulation to a multi-period index-tracking problem. The proposed model allows the tracking portfolio to be rebalanced at predetermined times while limiting the associated transaction costs. Two benchmark strategies are considered: a fixed portfolio with no rebalancing and a portfolio reselected under a large transaction-cost limit intended to approximate unrestricted rebalancing. The models are evaluated using constituent data for the SSE 50 and CSI 100 indices. Tracking performance is measured in-sample and out-of-sample for different portfolio cardinalities, sample lengths, and transaction-cost limits. Among the parameter values examined, at least one multi-period specification produces a lower out-of-sample root-mean-square error (RMSE) than both benchmarks in seven of the eight reported configurations. However, the optimal transaction-cost limit varies across configurations, indicating that tracking performance is sensitive to the permitted degree of rebalancing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: