This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Tubular floating frames are a potential platform for offshore floating photovoltaic (OFPV) systems, but the influence of array length on articulated motion and hydrodynamic-load distribution remains insufficiently understood. This study combines 1:25 physical-model experiments with coupled SPH–MoorDyn–Chrono simulations under regular waves. The single- and dual-module motion comparisons assess individual-body response and articulated motion transfer; the four-module records are presented as an in-sample fitted comparison. Numerical free-decay and parameter-sensitivity analyses characterize coupled oscillations and the dependence of local mooring harmonics on numerical settings. Extending the array from two to four modules does not uniformly amplify or suppress motion; it modifies inter-module phase relationships and redistributes mooring and module loads. The dual-module array exhibits stronger waveward mooring-load concentration and trailing-module rotational amplification, whereas the four-module array distributes rotational response over more modules. A reduced four-module waveward mooring load occurs at the sampled condition near λ/L ≈ 1.87. Side-hinge reaction indices depend on the numerical reaction distribution and do not uniquely determine physical connector loads. The comparisons cover six regular-wave periods in head seas for the adopted model configurations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: