This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The Besiege and Conquer Algorithm (BCA) organizes agent soldiers into armies to perform guerrilla-style search. However, its reliance on a single best guidance and greedy selection leads to premature convergence and poor diversity. We propose a Decision-oriented BCA (DBCA), which addresses these issues by adopting a cost–benefit decision framework. Unlike conventional meta-heuristics that accept any fitness-improving move, DBCA jointly evaluates the fitness benefits and movement costs of candidate solutions to determine optimal update positions. Specifically, The three candidate solution generators include: adaptive elite weighting, fitness-feedback step control, and periodic harmonic exploration. Meanwhile, DBCA updates individuals that maximize net profit and simultaneously penalizes overly large jumps that disrupt search continuity. A systematic ablation study with 10 variants verifies the contributions of the four mechanisms. Extensive experiments on 59 CEC benchmark functions demonstrate the effectiveness of DBCA. DBCA achieves the best performance on both CEC2017 and CEC2014 benchmarks and outperforms LSHADE_cnEpSin and JADE, respectively. Under an equal function evaluation budget on CEC2017 100D, DBCA follows FBCA in performance while outperforming LSHADE_cnEpSin. DBCA also achieved excellent performance on six constrained engineering problems, photovoltaic parameter identification, and multi-UAV problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: