Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates the performance trade-offs between melting and solidification in a rectangular phase change material (PCM) enclosure equipped with topology-optimized extended surfaces. Two topology-optimization design strategies are explored: a steady-state approach for solidification and a multi-step iterative procedure for melting. The solidification design ( S ) is obtained under steady-state conduction conditions, reflecting the dominance of conductive heat transfer during this transition. In contrast, the melting design ( M ) accounts for the coupled effects of conduction and natural convection by iteratively alternating between steady-state topology optimization and transient PCM simulations. Each iteration is stopped at a prescribed melt fraction, progressively adapting the design domain to the evolving phase change interface, say by using a multi-step approach. The two strategies yield markedly different geometries: the solidification-oriented design ( S 1 ) features symmetry and conduction-focused branches, whereas the melting-oriented designs ( M 1 -M 3 ) progressively enhance natural convection. Topology-optimized designs significantly outperform conventional straight-fin geometries in both solidification and melting. Solidification-optimized designs ( S 1 ) complete solidification in 298 min and sustain high early heat flux but show slower melting (110 min). Melting-optimized designs ( M 3 ) achieve faster melting, M 3 –5% (5% metal) completes in 85 min, while increasing the metal content to 10% in M 3 –10% reduces melting time by further 23 min relative to M 3 –5%, retaining about 97% of effective storage capacity. Higher metal fractions (>15%) accelerate melting only marginally while reducing latent heat storage, identifying the M 3 –10% as the optimal design compromise under the specific material properties and boundary conditions considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fragnito et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: