The application of entity linking to the scientific literature in specialised domains is a challenging area, particularly in multilingual and low-resource settings where terminology exhibits severe knowledge base sparsity. The present study investigates scientific entity linking in Kazakh and Russian across four academic domains. The following subjects are covered: Information Technology, Linguistics, Medicine and Psychology. This paper introduces SCIMDIX-EL, an enriched benchmark that aligns domain-specific terms with Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons identifiers, explicitly handling unlinkable (NIL) entities. Using this benchmark, we evaluate three methodological paradigms: zero-shot autoregressive generation with mGENRE, a hybrid web-retrieval pipeline pairing the Yandex Search API with large language models (Qwen2.5-7B and Sherkala-Chat-8B), and lightweight dictionary baselines, combined with learned abstention thresholds. In this corpus, common-prefix matching achieves a Macro-F1 of 67.72 in Kazakh, statistically indistinguishable from thresholded mGENRE at 67.81, while in Russian, mGENRE exceeds lexical matching by 14.83 percentage points. These results are consistent with a larger lexical contribution in Kazakh and a larger role for semantic disambiguation in Russian, but the language portions also differ in NIL prevalence, dictionary coverage, and mention composition. Error analysis reveals that generative and web-retrieval systems fail in non-overlapping instances, indicating a measurable headroom of 12.64 to 14.04 percentage points for future candidate reranking approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Batura et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: