Purpose: To report a 3-year ROI-based longitudinal follow-up of an nAMD-associated retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) tear using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT)–derived polarimetric entropy (PE), with concurrent MP-3 microperimetry. Methods: A 75-year-old woman with an nAMD-related RPE tear was followed for 3 years. At baseline and follow-up visits, decimal best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), structural OCT findings, en-face PE at the RPE level, and MP-3 retinal sensitivity were recorded. Two fixed regions of interest (ROIs; RPE tear ROI and RPE tear flap ROI) were defined at baseline and propagated across visits using image registration. Mean PE and mean MP-3 sensitivity (dB) were calculated within each ROI. Results: BCVA improved from 0.3 at baseline to 0.9 at 6 months and 1.0 at 1 year, then declined to 0.7 at 2 years and 0.6 at 3 years, when subretinal fluid (SRF) was present (anti-VEGF administered as needed). From baseline to 6 months, PE increased in both ROIs (RPE tear ROI: 0.085→0.193; RPE tear flap ROI: 0.413→0.543), and MP-3 sensitivity also increased (RPE tear ROI: 10.1→22.0 dB; RPE tear flap ROI: 14.0→19.7 dB). At 1 year, PE was 0.180/0.347 and MP-3 sensitivity was 22.2/17.2 dB in the RPE tear/RPE tear flap ROIs, respectively (BCVA 1.0). At the later SRF-positive visits, PE values were 0.182/0.350 at 2 years and 0.249/0.362 at 3 years, whereas MP-3 sensitivity decreased to 18.8/13.9 dB and 11.9/9.2 dB, respectively. Conclusion: PE increased during early follow-up and subsequently showed region-specific longitudinal changes within the RPE tear and RPE tear flap ROIs, while MP-3 sensitivity decreased at later visits associated with recurrent exudation. These findings suggest that PE may provide longitudinal structural information regarding RPE remodeling, with microperimetry providing complementary functional context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emoto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: