The optimization of multidrug cancer treatment schedules is a high-dimensional combinatorial optimization problem involving nonlinear tumor dynamics, pharmacokinetic interactions, and stringent toxicity constraints. When exploring large therapeutic search spaces, conventional optimization algorithms often exhibit limited scalability and become trapped in local optima. This simulation study proposes a hybrid quantum-classical optimization framework that employs QA to generate adaptive treatment schedules for precision oncology. The treatment scheduling problem is formulated as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) model, which encodes drug combinations, dosing intervals, toxicity constraints, and synergistic interactions within an Ising Hamiltonian compatible with D-Wave quantum annealing hardware. Global combinatorial optimization is performed using a D-Wave Advantage quantum annealer, while sequential least squares programming refines continuous dosage parameters under pharmacokinetic and toxicity constraints. Tumor progression is represented using a modified Gompertz growth model coupled with first-order pharmacokinetic dynamics. The proposed framework was evaluated using synthetic Digital Twin datasets generated from clinically realistic pharmacokinetic and tumor growth parameters. Simulation results demonstrated a maximum tumor regression ratio of 0.98 ± 0.02, compared with 0.82 ± 0.05 for standard-of-care protocols, while maintaining a lower cumulative toxicity index (40 ± 5 versus 75 ± 8) and reducing optimization time to less than 2 s for 120-variable scheduling problems. The hybrid framework exhibited near-linear computational scalability and maintained robustness under stochastic dosage perturbations (TRR > 0.95 at σ = 0.25). However, predictive classification performance remained limited (AUC = 0.49), highlighting the need for validation using longitudinal clinical datasets and multimodal patient-specific data. These findings demonstrate the potential of hybrid quantum-classical optimization as a scalable computational framework for adaptive treatment scheduling and personalized precision oncology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Egbunu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: