Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Coordinating joint actions requires participants to maintain moment-to-moment alignment as they progress through multiple tasks towards a shared goal. This creates the coordination problem of negotiating whether participants intend to continue to the next step in a task (i.e., make a horizontal transition) or shift to the next task (i.e., make a vertical transition). Language plays a central role in resolving this problem by enabling participants to distinguish horizontal and vertical transitions with specialised coordination markers (words like yeah, uh-huh, okay). Coordination markers constitute an important component of procedural coordination in adults; however, little is known about how children acquire the ability to use them. Here, we addressed this gap by investigating (1) how 4–8 year-old children speaking Swiss French and Vietnamese deploy coordination markers in peer interactions and (2) how the acquisition of these markers relates to the development of perspective-taking skills. In an experiment, we tested how N = 266 children and N = 158 adults from Switzerland and Vietnam navigated the joint task of LEGO model construction in visible (no barrier) and hidden (separated with a barrier) conditions. Our findings show that children acquire the ability to signal vertical transitions and the linguistic markers associated with them earlier than horizontal transitions. From early to middle childhood, there is a notable increase in both the frequency and diversity of coordination markers produced by children; however, their productivity remains limited compared to adults. Besides age, the acquisition of coordination markers is linked to the development of perspective-taking abilities, which enable children to flexibly adapt their use of coordination markers in response to changes in mutual visibility. Our study highlights how emerging socio-cognitive capacities support the acquisition of coordinating conventions across two typologically diverse languages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morozova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: