Portable ultrasound has been promoted as a tool for improving maternal referral decisions in low-resource clinics, yet the causal effect of imaging exposure on midwives' triage judgments remains unestimated. The design treats imaging exposure as a randomised within-vignette manipulation, with referral intention as the primary outcome and decision confidence and urgency as secondary outcomes. A before-after-control-impact estimator is proposed to separate the effect of imaging from secular trends and clinic-level heterogeneity. Operating characteristics are characterised under a declared variance structure with an intraclass correlation of 0.64, between-cluster standard deviation of 6.0 and residual standard deviation of 4.5. Power analysis across 2000 replications per design cell indicates that 54 clusters would be required to detect a 5-percentage-point effect at 80% power. The framework contributes a replicable design for estimating imaging exposure effects on clinical judgment in resource-constrained settings, and identifies the conditions under which vignette experiments can support causal inference about diagnostic technology adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mwangi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: