Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The AMP Registry was set up in Germany to monitor routine care following lower limb loss. In this clinical context, the assessment of gait via marker-based 3D movement analysis is typically too time-consuming. Feasibility and face validity of an innovative markerless approach were therefore tested. Objectives: This study evaluated the feasibility and face validity of time-distance parameters, joint kinematics, and kinetics, as outcomes from the Theia3D markerless movement analysis system in routine medical assessments. Study Design: A single-center, prospective study was conducted, including participants with transtibial and transfemoral amputations, as well as a reference group of typically developed adults. Methods: The gait of 19 participants with transtibial amputations and 20 participants with transfemoral amputations was assessed via markerless 3D motion capture. Descriptive statistics were performed according to amputation level. Results: The characteristics of prosthetic gait after transtibial and transfemoral amputation, as determined by markerless gait analysis, were consistent with earlier findings in the literature obtained via traditional marker-based motion capture, thereby validating this novel method. Furthermore, the measurement time was reduced to 15 minutes. Conclusions: Markerless 3D motion capture is a promising tool for assessing gait in routine prosthetic care of patients after limb loss. However, post-processing times of up to 2 hours still need to be reduced for the method to be used in clinical practice. Clinical Relevance Statement: Detailed assessment of gait via 3D methods allows for a refined documentation of functional deficits in patients after limb loss, helping to improve prosthetic care and training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeitzschel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: