We consider two bosons in the one-dimensional Bose–Hubbard model with hopping amplitude J and constant on-site repulsion U, both subject to the same weak, static, stationary Gaussian lattice potential. For a repulsively bound pair of total quasimomentum K we derive in closed form the second-order (golden-rule) kernel for transitions into the interacting two-particle scattering continuum at transferred momentum q. The kernel is strictly positive throughout the kinematically open region and vanishes as a square root at its edges. Its continuum factor coincides with that of the known dissociation rate under hopping modulation, while the static density coupling contributes a momentum-dependent form factor and a folded on-shell support. For flat high-pass disorder spectra the kernel gives an exact classification of when dissociation and elastic backscattering vanish at order W² in the disorder strength. For π/2 < |K| < π and U < 4J sin(|K|/2), a critical interaction U* = 4J√(−cos K) separates pairs whose second-order dissociation can be removed by a finite spectral gap from those for which it cannot, and there is a window in which backscattering is closed while dissociation stays open. As the gap edge q0 approaches the largest open transfer qc, the coefficient vanishes as Δ^(3/2), Δ^(1/2) or Δ, with Δ = qc − q0, or tends to a nonzero plateau, depending on the geometry of the open region and on whether the pass-band height or the on-site variance is held fixed. Exact finite-ring simulations of the bound-band population reproduce the predicted enhancement and suppression for the two normalizations. This preprint includes the complete analytic proofs and numerical-check appendices. It is not an accepted journal publication. The PDF is unchanged from the author’s final manuscript dated 15 October 2026. Supporting data and code: 10.5281/zenodo.23390681. Public repository with the manuscript, source, figures and reproduction instructions: https://github.com/SHIN09-git/hubbard-pair-correlated-disorder. Generative AI was used extensively in the research and manuscript preparation. The manuscript and the repository’s AI-use record disclose the reported model roles, human verification scope and limitations. JIN HANZHE is the sole human author and takes responsibility for the work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
HanZhe Jin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: