Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Travel distance to community mental health services is widely assumed to shape antipsychotic adherence in rural Africa, yet the causal status of travel-cost exposure remains poorly identified because distance and need are jointly determined. The design treats the voucher threshold as a source of quasi-random variation in out-of-pocket travel burden, defines a sharp discontinuity in exposure at the eligibility cut-off, and specifies the assumptions under which a local average treatment effect is identified. Using the DHS Program indicator 'Knowledge of any method of contraception among married women' (FP_KMET_W_ANY) as a calibration benchmark for the survey infrastructure that would generate the outcome data, the paper reports the indicator's distribution across 162 country-survey observations in 38 African countries between 1986 and 2025 (mean 91.776, standard deviation 11.342, minimum Chad 57.80, maximum Eswatini 99.90). The contribution is methodological: it specifies the identification conditions, the bandwidth and polynomial choices, the manipulation and covariate-balance diagnostics, and the interpretation of the estimand for a policy-relevant travel-cost exposure, and it argues that the voucher threshold is a defensible instrument only when distance is measured administratively rather than self-reported. The paper concludes that the design can support credible inference on travel-cost exposure where the threshold is sharp, the running variable is not manipulable, and the outcome is ascertained through clinic records rather than patient recall.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shikongo-Nghipandulwa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: