Essential medicines stockouts in community mental health services are widely reported, but their behavioural consequences for prescribing remain poorly quantified. The framework treats stockout duration as a supply-chain exposure with a dose-response structure, distinguishes switching driven by clinical judgement from switching forced by unavailability, and specifies the parallel-trends and no-anticipation assumptions required for identification. Because no clinic-level dispensing or stockout data were available for this analysis, the paper is methodological rather than empirical: it formalises the exposure, defines the estimand, derives the difference-in-differences specification, and sets out the threats to validity that a field implementation would face. To anchor the design in measurable quantities, the paper draws on a real DHS Program indicator of family planning messages delivered at community meetings across fifteen African countries between 2021 and 2025, with a mean of 29.733 and a standard deviation of 17.495, to illustrate the scale of between-country heterogeneity that a multi-site supply-chain study must accommodate. The contribution is a pre-specified, falsifiable estimation strategy for linking stockout duration to antipsychotic switching, together with an explicit account of the conditions under which the resulting estimates would and would not support causal interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mwale-Banda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: