Field-scale monitoring of soil and water processes under commercial irrigation remains uncommon, despite its value for understanding salinity and sodicity development outside laboratory settings. This study monitored two furrows on a commercial sugarcane farm in the Lower Burdekin Delta, Australia, spanning a clay-content gradient of 44.9–51.9%, with soil sampling following irrigation with surface water, groundwater, and a farmer-managed blend. Continuous monitoring showed wetting and solute redistribution concentrated in the upper 35 cm, while deeper layers remained comparatively stable. Deep percolation represented 8–49% of applied irrigation. Electrical conductivity (EC), Na+, and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) increased along the furrow (Spearman ρ = 0.89–0.95; Friedman p ≤ 0.006), with the finer-textured end showing the greatest accumulation. Irrigation-water risk increased from surface water (EC 0.24 dS m−1; SAR 1.05) to blended water (0.90; 4.45) and groundwater (1.48; 6.48), with groundwater exceeding guideline limits for EC and SAR. At the furrow end, exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) exceeded the 15% root-growth threshold (20.3% baseline; 23.5–32.2% after irrigation), while indicative saturated-extract EC (4.8–9.0 dS m−1) exceeded the 1.7 dS m−1 sugarcane threshold. These findings demonstrate the value of continuous field monitoring and identify spatial variability and water source as candidate factors warranting confirmation under replicated designs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Catania et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: