Cybersecurity systems must protect digital identities, data, devices, and transactions against tampering, unauthorisedaccess, and service disruption. Many conventional security architectures rely on centrally managed records and trustedadministrators; these can become attractive targets and may provide limited visibility when logs are altered or distributedacross organisations. This paper presents a proposed blockchain-supported cybersecurity framework that uses a replicatedledger, cryptographic hashes, digital signatures, and policy-based access to strengthen auditability and integrity. Thedesign considers identity and access events, security-log integrity, configuration changes, and controlled sharing of threatindicators. Sensitive payloads are kept off-chain, while the ledger stores hashes, timestamps, references, and authorisedapprovals. The paper describes the motivation, architecture, workflow, implementation plan, evaluation metrics,applications, and limitations. Blockchain is treated as a supporting trust and audit mechanism rather than a replacement forencryption, secure software development, endpoint protection, or incident response. The proposal requires empiricaltesting before any claims about performance or security improvement can be made.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashwini Shingade (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: