This study evaluated coal-enrichment plant refuse (CEPR) as an amendment combined with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Einkorn wheat was grown in a 5 × 2 factorial experiment comprising five CEPR application rates (0%, 5%, 10%, 20%, and 40%) and two PGPR treatments (PGPR− and PGPR+). In addition to plant growth parameters, growing-medium pH and salinity, as well as plant macronutrient, micronutrient, and potentially toxic trace-element concentrations, were evaluated. PGPR increased plant height, fresh biomass, and dry biomass by 285%, 200%, and 270%, respectively, while increasing K, Zn, and Mn concentrations by 132%, 337%, and 53%, respectively; total uptake of these elements was also higher under PGPR treatment. CEPR increased growing-medium pH from 7.54 to 8.03 without increasing salinity risk. Moderate CEPR rates (5%–10%) produced the most favorable growth responses, whereas higher rates (20%–40%) were associated with reduced growth and increased growing-medium pH. Ni and Cd concentrations in plant tissues varied across treatments; these measurements alone do not establish the long-term environmental safety of CEPR application. Under the conditions of this short-term pot experiment, the 5%–10% CEPR treatments showed the most favorable plant-growth responses when combined with PGPR. These findings identify a treatment range for further investigation; its suitability for mine-soil reclamation requires longer-term field testing across different soils and CEPR sources, including assessment under weathering, rainfall, and seasonal variation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarıhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: