Questions about Islamic law need exact answers with sources. A wrong citation is a serious failure. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) fits this need, but Urdu is a low-resource language and there is little guidance for building such a system. This paper reviews the design choices behind an Urdu Fatawa RAG system and proposes a reference architecture. We compare Urdu-capable language models, embedding models, tokenizer cost, vector databases, primary data stores, and backend frameworks against four requirements: faithfulness to sources, precision on close jurisprudential terms, Urdu fluency, and private self-hosting. We argue for chunk-level storage of question-answer pairs, hybrid dense and sparse retrieval fused by reciprocal rank fusion, a prompt with English instructions and an Urdu output example, and a three-container deployment that separates inference, vector search, and the API. Our choices rest on published benchmarks, not on a controlled comparison on our own corpus, and some remain hypotheses. We state which ones, and we give an evaluation plan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abis Hussain (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: