The Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale (SCAS) and its parent version (SCAS-P) are widely used and psychometrically supported measures that contribute meaningfully to multi-informant assessment of adolescent anxiety. However, their internal structure and convergent validity within a multitrait–multimethod framework have not been examined. This study addressed this gap by evaluating the internal structure of the SCAS and SCAS-P in Adolescent (n = 302; 12–19 years; 60.3% female) and Parent samples (n = 314; 30–70 years; 83.8% female). The original six-factor model showed acceptable fit and was retained for both the SCAS and the SCAS-P measuring separation anxiety, social anxiety, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, panic/agoraphobia, generalized anxiety, and fear of injury. A nested Dyad sample (n = 198) was then used to test the multitrait–multimethod construct validity of this model. Results generally supported multi-informant construct validity of the SCAS and the SCAS-P, though the specific perspective of each informant introduced substantial unique variance into the scores. Furthermore, the validity of specific dimensions was qualified: multi-informant convergence was limited for obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and generalized anxiety was insufficiently distinct from the remaining measures. Still, findings support the SCAS and SCAS-P as useful and flexible tools for assessing adolescent anxiety as reported by the adolescent and/or their parents, supporting the assessment of anxiety-related difficulties and providing a multi-informant understanding of adolescents’ anxiety symptoms in both research and clinical contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vagos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: