Key result
Novel combined model predicts PAH in T2DM with ~0.78 AUC in validation.
Why the study?
Pulmonary arterial hypertension is an important cardiopulmonary complication in patients with T2DM, yet practical models integrating routinely available clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic information remain limited.
Does a prediction model integrating clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic information accurately identify or stratify risk for pulmonary arterial hypertension in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Cohort (n=24,518)
No
Does a prediction model integrating clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic information accurately identify or stratify risk for pulmonary arterial hypertension in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Effect estimate: C-index 0.666 (95% CI 0.631-0.699)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.3% vs 4%
p-value: p=0.453 (Hosmer-Lemeshow)
In hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, clinical and echocardiographic prediction models showed moderate-to-good discrimination for identifying pulmonary arterial hypertension after echocardiography, with cardiac cavity and vascular dilatation serving as the strongest non-gradient discriminator.
May inform PAH suspicion thresholds in screened cohorts; leaves open prospective validation of detection strategies.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is an important cardiopulmonary complication in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), yet practical models integrating routinely available clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic information remain limited. We conducted a single‐center retrospective electronic medical record cohort study with a prespecified temporal split. Patients admitted from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2021 formed the training cohort, and those admitted from January 1, 2022 to July 31, 2025 formed the temporal validation cohort. Among 47,042 pre‐2022 records screened, 10,458 eligible patients were included in the training cohort, including 423 patients with PAH (4.0%); among 60,069 later records screened, 14,060 patients were included in the validation cohort, including 600 patients with PAH (4.3%). Nine prespecified clinical domains were initially evaluated. Because tricuspid regurgitation velocity/gradient contributed to the echocardiographic PAH classification, a sensitivity analysis excluded the PAH‐related pressure‐gradient domain from the exploratory combined model to reduce incorporation bias. In the training‐cohort sensitivity analysis, cardiac cavity and vascular dilatation was the strongest remaining individual discriminator (area under the curve [AUC], 0.819), followed by coagulation dysfunction (AUC, 0.697) and cardiac dysfunction (AUC, 0.627); the pressure‐gradient‐excluded combined model achieved an AUC of 0.823. When applied without refitting to the temporal validation cohort, this sensitivity model achieved an AUC of 0.780. The eight‐variable echocardiography‐informed nomogram had a C‐index of 0.666 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.631–0.699), with a Hosmer‐Lemeshow p value of 0.453. Because the nomogram includes echocardiographic predictors, including tricuspid regurgitation velocity and pulmonary valve velocity, it is intended for risk stratification after echocardiography rather than pre‐echocardiographic screening or prediction of incident PAH. Diabetes‐specific variables such as HbA1c, diabetes duration, treatment exposure, insulin resistance indices, and microvascular complications were not consistently available in the historical records and were not modeled. Prospective multicenter studies with systematic collection of diabetes‐specific variables are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geng et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Pulmonary arterial hypertension in type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=24,518). Clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic prediction models (eight-variable nomogram and pressure-gradient-excluded combined model) was evaluated on Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (C-index 0.666, 95% CI 0.631-0.699, p=0.453 (Hosmer-Lemeshow)). A pressure-gradient-excluded combined model predicted PAH in T2DM with an AUC of 0.780 in validation, while an 8-variable nomogram achieved a C-index of 0.666 (95% CI 0.631-0.699).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: