Key result
Anthropometric obesity indices fail to identify elevated cIMT in young healthy adults.
Why the study?
Traditional obesity measures like BMI and waist circumference have limitations, while emerging indices like BRI and ABSI may better reflect fat distribution and cardiovascular risk. Their association with carotid intima-media thickness in young healthy adults needed examination.
Do traditional and emerging anthropometric indices (BMI, WC, WHtR, BRI, and ABSI) associate with or predict subclinical carotid atherosclerosis (measured by cIMT) in young healthy adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=572)
Blinded outcome assessment (radiologists blinded to participant information)
No
Do traditional and emerging anthropometric indices (BMI, WC, WHtR, BRI, and ABSI) associate with or predict subclinical carotid atherosclerosis (measured by cIMT) in young healthy adults?
In young healthy adults free of cardiometabolic comorbidities, neither traditional (BMI, WC, WHtR) nor emerging (BRI, ABSI) anthropometric indices independently predict or discriminate subclinical carotid atherosclerosis after adjusting for metabolic and lifestyle risk factors.
Anthropometric indices should not guide cIMT assessment in young adults; leaves open longitudinal predictive value.
Background Obesity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but traditional measures like BMI and waist circumference have limitations. New indices, BRI and ABSI, may better reflect fat distribution and cardiovascular risk. This study examined their association with carotid intima‐media thickness (cIMT) in young healthy adults. Methods In this cross‐sectional study within the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) framework, 572 adults aged 20–40 years underwent anthropometric assessments, biochemical tests and carotid ultrasound for cIMT measurement. Anthropometric indices including BMI, WC, waist‐to‐height ratio (WHtR), ABSI and BRI were calculated. Associations between these indices and cIMT were analysed using correlation and multivariable linear regression models adjusting for demographic, metabolic and lifestyle factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses assessed the predictive ability of the indices for elevated cIMT. Result BRI and WHtR were nearly collinear ( r = 0.997) and showed modest positive correlations with cIMT in unadjusted analyses ( r = 0.103 for both), but these associations weakened after adjustment for cardiometabolic risk factors. WC was the only independent predictor of cIMT in partially adjusted models, though this significance disappeared in fully adjusted analyses. ABSI exhibited a significant but mechanistically unexpected inverse association with cIMT. ROC analyses indicated limited discriminative power for all anthropometric measures in predicting high cIMT, with BRI and WHtR having the highest but still modest area under the curve (AUC). Conclusion In young healthy adults, BRI and WHtR showed modest associations with subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, which weakened after adjustment. Waist circumference was an inconsistent predictor, and ABSI demonstrated an inverse relationship with cIMT. Further longitudinal studies are needed to confirm their clinical utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abiri et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in young healthy adults (n=572). Anthropometric obesity indices (BMI, WC, WHtR, BRI, ABSI) vs. Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) <75th percentile (n=483) vs >75th percentile (n=89) was evaluated on Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and elevated cIMT (>75th percentile) (AUC 0.549 (for BRI and WHtR); r = 0.103 (unadjusted correlation for BRI and WHtR with cIMT), p=0.149). Traditional and emerging anthropometric indices (BMI, WC, WHtR, BRI, ABSI) failed to significantly discriminate elevated cIMT in young healthy adults (max AUC 0.549, p=0.149) or maintain significance after full adjustment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: