Key result
Postpartum blood pressure monitoring relies primarily on in-hospital assessment and rarely evaluates patient preferences.
Why the study?
Identifying individuals with persistent postpartum hypertension after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is an important strategy to mitigate long-term cardiovascular risks, motivating a synthesis of literature on assessment methods.
Postpartum hypertension assessment methods vary widely in timing, setting, and blood pressure thresholds, highlighting the need for standardized, patient-centered guidelines.
Clinicians should interpret postpartum hypertension data cautiously amid inconsistent definitions; this review leaves open optimal protocols for prospective standardization.
Background Identifying individuals with persistent postpartum hypertension (ppHTN) after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is an important strategy to mitigate associated long‐term cardiovascular risks. Accordingly, we aimed to review the literature surrounding the assessment of ppHTN after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Methods We conducted a scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. We developed and pilot‐tested a data extraction tool to collect information on ppHTN assessment methods, including timing and setting, blood pressure (BP) thresholds used, and inclusion of patient preferences. Data were synthesized into tables and narrative summaries. Barriers and facilitators to BP assessment protocols, remote BP monitoring, and follow‐up attendance were mapped using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation ‐ Behavior (COM‐B) framework. Results Of 14 593 records, 96 papers met inclusion criteria. BP measured in the hospital alone was most common (n=41), followed by the hospital/home combination (n=18), and the outpatient/home combination (n=9). Monitoring typically began within 0 to 7 days postpartum (n=28), ending at 1 to 6 weeks (n=20) or 6 to 12 months (n=20) postpartum. ppHTN was defined using elevated BP thresholds (n=28), most commonly ≥140/90 mm Hg (n=18), medication initiation (n=8), lack of BP normalization over time (n=4), or referral to a specialist (n=2). Only 7 studies assessed patient preferences. Facilitators to home BP assessment included the use of educational material, while barriers involved digital access limitations. Conclusions ppHTN assessment methods varied in timing, setting, and BP thresholds. Findings underscore the need for standardized, patient‐centered guidelines that account for BP assessment methods across settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daneshmand et al. (2026) conducted a review in Persistent postpartum hypertension following hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Postpartum blood pressure assessment methods was evaluated on Assessment methods, settings, timing, and blood pressure thresholds for persistent postpartum hypertension. Postpartum BP assessment Across 96 studies most often occurred in hospitals alone (n=41), used a >=140/90 mm Hg threshold (n=18), and rarely evaluated patient preferences (n=7).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: