Key result
Prior DOAC or warfarin use is not linked to higher mortality after acute GI bleeding.
Why the study?
Reported outcomes after gastrointestinal bleeding in anticoagulated patients are inconsistent, and comparisons with non-anticoagulated patients are limited.
Does prior exposure to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin increase 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality compared to no anticoagulation in adults presenting with acute gastrointestinal bleeding?
Cohort (n=11,387)
Does prior exposure to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin increase 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality compared to no anticoagulation in adults presenting with acute gastrointestinal bleeding?
In patients presenting with acute gastrointestinal bleeding, pre-bleeding use of DOACs or warfarin is not independently associated with increased 30-day or 1-year mortality after adjusting for baseline patient characteristics and presentation severity.
Does not warrant withholding anticoagulants post-GI bleed over mortality concerns; observational data leaves open optimal resumption strategies.
Background and Aims Reported outcomes after gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in anticoagulated patients are inconsistent, and comparisons with non‐anticoagulated patients are limited. We assessed whether anticoagulation status was independently associated with mortality after GIB and identified predictors of death. Methods We analysed 11,387 consecutive adults with acute GIB over 25 years ( n = 500 direct oral anticoagulant [DOAC], n = 353 warfarin, n = 10,534 non‐anticoagulated). All‐cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year was modelled using overlap‐weighted logistic regression, with complete mortality follow‐up through the Israeli National Population Registry. Results Anticoagulated patients were older (median age 81.7 [DOAC] and 75.1 [warfarin] vs. 58.4 years), had greater comorbidity and higher crude mortality than non‐anticoagulated patients. After overlap weighting, neither DOAC nor warfarin was significantly associated with mortality (30‐day OR 1.61, 95% CI 0.81–3.21 for DOAC and 1.30, 95% CI 0.56–3.02 for warfarin; 1‐year OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62–1.31 and 1.08, 95% CI 0.69–1.69). At 30 days, mortality was associated with age, haemodynamic shock (OR 4.25) and Internal Medicine ward admission (OR 4.55); at 1 year, with age, renal failure, Internal Medicine ward admission and inversely with male sex. Anticoagulation was resumed at discharge in 37.8% of survivors. Conclusions Neither DOAC nor warfarin was significantly associated with 30‐day or 1‐year mortality after GIB, including when bleeding severity and admitting ward were excluded from the outcome model. Thirty‐day mortality was associated with severity at presentation, whereas 1‐year mortality was associated with underlying patient characteristics. Resumption was not significantly associated with mortality or readmission for recurrent bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Forkosh et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute gastrointestinal bleeding (n=11,387). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) or warfarin vs. Non-anticoagulated patients was evaluated on All-cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year (OR 1.61, 95% CI 0.81-3.21). Neither DOAC (30-day OR 1.61; 95% CI 0.81-3.21) nor warfarin (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.56-3.02) was significantly associated with mortality after acute gastrointestinal bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Atrial fibrillationMore from Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics