Key result
Simultaneous pressure monitoring guides valve-in-valve TAVI redeployment, enabling postdilatation that lowers mean gradients by ~12 mmHg.
Why the study?
This report describes hemodynamic guidance during valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation using simultaneous aortic and left ventricular pressure monitoring.
Does simultaneous aortic and left ventricular pressure monitoring guide successful valve deployment and recapture during valve-in-valve TAVI in a patient with a failed surgical bioprosthesis?
Case Report (n=1)
Does simultaneous aortic and left ventricular pressure monitoring guide successful valve deployment and recapture during valve-in-valve TAVI in a patient with a failed surgical bioprosthesis?
Simultaneous aortic and left ventricular pressure monitoring during valve-in-valve TAVI complements fluoroscopy by providing real-time hemodynamic feedback to support timely recapture when abnormal hemodynamics occur.
May aid detection of deployment failure in valve-in-valve TAVI; leaves open need for prospective validation before routine use.
OBJECTIVES: To describe hemodynamic guidance during valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation using simultaneous aortic and left ventricular pressure monitoring. KEY STEPS: A 90-year-old woman with a failed 19-mm surgical bioprosthesis and severe transvalvular regurgitation underwent valve-in-valve implantation with a self-expanding valve guided by a SavvyWire. During the first deployment, the aortic waveform remained completely flat after pacing was discontinued, whereas left ventricular pulsatility persisted; the valve was recaptured. During the second deployment, aortic pulsatility recovered after pacing cessation; final release was performed. Postdilatation reduced the invasive mean transvalvular gradient from 23 to 11 mm Hg. POTENTIAL PITFALLS: A flat aortic waveform with preserved left ventricular pulsatility is a warning sign warranting system confirmation and multimodality reassessment, not a specific diagnosis of leaflet dysfunction. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Simultaneous pressure monitoring can complement fluoroscopy when valve function is uncertain during deployment and may support timely recapture when abnormal hemodynamics persist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Konami et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Failed surgical aortic bioprosthesis with severe transvalvular regurgitation (n=1). Valve-in-valve TAVI with simultaneous aortic and left ventricular pressure monitoring using SavvyWire and postdilatation was evaluated on Invasive mean transvalvular gradient. Simultaneous pressure monitoring guided successful valve recapture and redeployment during valve-in-valve TAVI, with postdilatation reducing the mean transvalvular gradient from 23 to 11 mm Hg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: