Key result
Endovascular therapy yields ~2.3-fold higher odds of excellent functional outcome in mild LVO stroke.
Why the study?
Does endovascular therapy plus medical management improve 90-day functional outcomes compared with medical management alone in patients with mild acute ischemic stroke from anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion?
RCT (n=304)
Open-label
1:1 ratio
Yes
Does endovascular therapy plus medical management improve 90-day functional outcomes compared with medical management alone in patients with mild acute ischemic stroke from anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion?
In patients with mild acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion and substantial at-risk tissue, endovascular therapy within 24 hours plus medical management significantly improved 90-day functional outcomes compared to medical management alone, despite a 13.2% rate of serious procedural complications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Endovascular therapy may improve 90-day outcomes in selected mild anterior LVO stroke; leaves open confirmation in diverse populations before changing practice.
Background Whether endovascular therapy benefits patients with mild acute ischemic stroke from large-vessel occlusion involving the anterior circulation is uncertain. Methods We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial in China involving patients with acute ischemic stroke of mild clinical severity (defined by a score of <6 on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) that had resulted from large-vessel occlusion involving the anterior circulation. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive endovascular therapy plus medical management or medical management alone. The primary outcome was an excellent functional outcome (defined by a modified Rankin scale score of 0 [no symptoms] or 1 [no clinically significant disability]) at 90 days. Results A total of 304 patients underwent randomization, of whom 300 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population: 144 in the endovascular-therapy group and 156 in the medical-management group. At 90 days, a modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1 was reported in 69.4% of the patients in the endovascular-therapy group and in 50.0% of those in the medical-management group (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.41 to 3.81; P<0.001). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours occurred in 3 patients in each group. Serious procedure-related complications occurred in 19 patients (13.2%) in the endovascular-therapy group. Among all the participants, one death occurred (in the endovascular-therapy group). Conclusions In this trial from China involving patients with mild acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusion and substantial at-risk tissue on perfusion imaging, endovascular therapy performed within 24 hours after symptom onset plus medical management resulted in better 90-day functional outcomes than medical management alone, without an increase in the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage but with a high incidence of serious procedural complications. (Funded by Fujian Medical University Union Hospital and others; MILD-MT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06179017.)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Mild acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion involving the anterior circulation (n=304). Endovascular therapy plus medical management vs. Medical management alone was evaluated on Excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1) at 90 days (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.41-3.81, p=<0.001). Endovascular therapy plus medical management improved 90-day excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) vs medical management alone in mild LVO stroke (69.4% vs 50.0%; OR 2.32; 95% CI 1.41-3.81; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: