Key result
Physical literacy program lowers systolic blood pressure by ~8 mmHg vs usual care in hypertension.
Why the study?
The study examined whether a theoretically grounded, 8-week physical literacy intervention incorporating salutogenic model components improves physical activity levels and clinical outcomes in young and middle-aged adults with Grade 1 hypertension, while exploring participants' subjective experiences.
Does an 8-week multidimensional physical literacy intervention program improve physical activity levels, blood pressure, and psychosocial outcomes in young and middle-aged adults with Grade 1 hypertension compared to usual care?
Does an 8-week multidimensional physical literacy intervention program improve physical activity levels, blood pressure, and psychosocial outcomes in young and middle-aged adults with Grade 1 hypertension compared to usual care?
Mean Difference: -8.395 (95% CI -11.724–-5.067)
Absolute Event Rate: 142.88% vs 151.28%
p-value: p=<0.001
An 8-week multidimensional physical literacy intervention significantly reduced systolic blood pressure and BMI while improving physical literacy, psychosocial resilience, and physical activity in young and middle-aged adults with Grade 1 hypertension.
Hypothesis-generating for physical literacy programs in Grade 1 hypertension; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
Objective To examine whether a theoretically grounded, 8-week physical literacy intervention incorporating salutogenic model components (sense of coherence, social support, and self-efficacy) could improve physical activity levels and clinical outcomes in young and middle-aged adults with Grade 1 hypertension, and to explore participants’ subjective experiences of the program. Methods A mixed-methods quasi-experimental study was conducted between August and October 2024. Forty patients aged 18–59 years were recruited from a community healthcare center and allocated to the intervention group (n = 20) or control group (n = 20). The intervention group received a multidimensional physical-literacy program, while the control group received usual care. Five participants were lost to follow-up; 35 (intervention: n = 17; control: n = 18) completed all three assessments: baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), and one-month follow-up (T2). Quantitative outcomes (SBP, BMI, physical-literacy scores, social support, sense of coherence, self-efficacy, and physical activity) were analyzed using independent t -tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for between-group comparisons and paired t -tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for within-group changes, with significance set at α = 0.05 (two-tailed). Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results Of the 40 recruited participants, 35 (87.5%) completed the study. Post-intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significant reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP), body weight, and BMI compared to baseline (all P < 0.05). Significant improvements were also observed in PL scores, social support, sense of coherence, and self-efficacy ( P < 0.05). Qualitative findings corroborated these results, highlighting enhanced health literacy and stress alleviation, despite some logistical challenges. Conclusion The PL intervention is a feasible and effective strategy to improve health outcomes and psychosocial resilience in hypertensive adults, offering a promising approach for community-based chronic disease management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guiyue Ma (2026) studied Grade 1 hypertension (n=40). Multidimensional physical literacy intervention program vs. Usual care was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (SBP, mmHg) at 1-month follow-up (T2) (MD -8.395 mmHg, 95% CI -11.724 to -5.067, p=<0.001). An 8-week physical literacy program significantly reduced systolic blood pressure at 1-month follow-up compared to usual care (MD -8.40 mmHg, P<0.001) in adults with Grade 1 hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: