This systematic review examines community-led water governance in Cape Town, South Africa, following the 2015-2018 "Day Zero" drought crisis. The analysis is grounded in political ecology, water justice theory, and collaborative governance theory, which together provide the conceptual framework for understanding how structural inequalities and power asymmetries shaped community-agency dynamics during the crisis. Despite constitutional mandates for public participation, the study finds that community engagement during the crisis was largely reactive and antagonistic, characterized by "invented" participation through protests and litigation, rather than the "invited" collaboration envisioned by law. Key community groups, such as the Western Cape Water Caucus and the Water Crisis Coalition, emerged to challenge inequitable water tariffs and failures in service delivery. The analysis identifies significant barriers to effective community-agency collaboration, including inequitable implementation of water restrictions, institutional disregard for community input, and the enduring legacy of apartheid-era spatial and social inequalities. The paper concludes that moving beyond a top-down, technocratic governance model is essential. It recommends formalizing community roles in water bylaws, reforming tariff structures for equity, and building community capacity to foster a sustainable, collaborative, and equitable water governance framework for Cape Town and other water-scarce regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gumbo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: