Surface hopping (SH) methods are typically employed to simulate ultrafast nonadiabatic processes, but long time scales often remain beyond their reach. To address this, the accelerated SH scheme mitigates this limitation by scaling the driving forces of such processes, either nonadiabatic couplings (NACs) in the case of internal conversion or spin–orbit couplings (SOCs) for intersystem crossing. However, obtaining the actual time constant requires extrapolation from several ensembles of trajectories with different scaling factors. This introduces a significant computational demand, often restricting the number of trajectories per ensemble and, therefore, reducing the statistical confidence in the resulting time constant. In this work, we investigate the accelerated scheme using silaethylene (CH2SiH2) as a case study, evaluating various population fitting methods and extrapolation techniques. We trained machine learning models for potential energy surfaces (PESs) and NACs, and extended our Rotate-Predict-Rotate approach to fit SOCs. These models demonstrate high performance, yielding populations within the confidence interval of the reference MR-CISD/SA-CASSCF(2,2) data; however, the extrapolation itself is highly sensitive to the fitted time constants, leading to discrepancies in the final time constant. Finally, we showcase and discuss how ML models can enhance the reliability of an accelerated SH scheme.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martinka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: