Key result
CHG index (HR 1.05, p=0.07) and GLMI (HR 1.02, p=0.485) were not significantly associated with 9-year incident heart disease after covariate adjustment and showed poor discrimination (AUC 0.517-0.561).
Why the study?
The cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose (CHG) index and glucose-lipid metabolic index (GLMI) have been associated with cardiovascular outcomes, but studies on their associations with incident heart disease in Chinese populations remain scarce.
Are the CHG index and GLMI independently associated with and able to discriminate incident heart disease in middle-aged and older Chinese adults?
Cohort (n=5,549)
Yes
Are the CHG index and GLMI independently associated with and able to discriminate incident heart disease in middle-aged and older Chinese adults?
Unadjusted associations of the CHG index and GLMI with incident heart disease become non-significant after adjusting for conventional risk factors, and both indices show poor standalone discrimination (AUCs 0.517-0.561), indicating they are insufficient as standalone screening tools in middle-aged and older Chinese adults.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a major global health challenge. The cholesterol–high-density lipoprotein–glucose (CHG) index and glucose-lipid metabolic index (GLMI) have been associated with cardiovascular outcomes, but studies on their associations with incident heart disease in Chinese populations remain scarce. This study compared their associations with incident heart disease and assessed their standalone discriminative ability in middle-aged and older Chinese adults. This cohort study included 5,549 adults aged ≥ 45 years from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Baseline data (2011) were used to calculate the CHG index and GLMI; incident heart disease was ascertained over 9 years. Cox proportional hazards models with sequential adjustment, restricted cubic splines (RCS), Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, and subgroup analyses were used to examine associations and describe standalone discrimination. During 9 years of follow-up, 1,404 (25.3%) participants developed heart disease. In unadjusted models, each 1-standard deviation (1-SD) increase in the CHG index was associated with an 11% higher hazard (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.05–1.16), and each 1-SD increase in GLMI was associated with a 6% higher hazard (HR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03–1.10; both P < 0.001). The highest quartile had the strongest associations (CHG: HR = 1.31; GLMI: HR = 1.42). After adjustment for age, sex, BMI, smoking, and drinking (Model 2), both associations became non-significant; further adjustment (Model 3) yielded similar results. In unadjusted KM analyses, higher quartiles had higher cumulative incidence (log-rank P < 0.001). RCS analyses showed no significant overall or nonlinear associations after adjustment. Time-dependent ROC analyses yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.517–0.561, indicating poor standalone discrimination. DeLong tests showed occasional significant differences, but absolute AUC differences were small. Subgroup analyses found no significant interactions (all P for interaction > 0.05). The CHG index and GLMI were associated with incident heart disease in unadjusted analyses, but these associations attenuated after sequential adjustment for conventional risk factors. Both indices showed poor standalone discrimination (AUCs 0.517–0.561), with numerically small differences between them. Current evidence is not yet sufficient to support these indices as standalone screening tools for heart disease in this Chinese middle-aged and older population. Future studies should focus on specific cardiac endpoints and incorporate comprehensive metabolomic profiling to clarify their role in risk stratification. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Incident heart disease (composite of myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease, angina pectoris, heart failure, or other heart problems) (n=5,549). Cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose (CHG) index and glucose-lipid metabolic index (GLMI) per 1-SD increase vs. Lower index values (per 1-SD or lowest quartile Q1 reference) was evaluated on Self-reported incident heart disease (composite of myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease, angina pectoris, heart failure, or other heart problems) in primary adjusted Model 2 (CHG index per 1-SD) (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.11, p=0.07). CHG index (HR 1.05, p=0.07) and GLMI (HR 1.02, p=0.485) were not significantly associated with 9-year incident heart disease after covariate adjustment and showed poor discrimination (AUC 0.517-0.561).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: