Key result
Combined negative ΔCO and positive ΔSVR after clazosentan is linked to ~11-fold higher DCI risk.
Why the study?
Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) can still develop after subarachnoid hemorrhage despite clazosentan reducing angiographic vasospasm, and it was unclear whether systemic cardiovascular responses to clazosentan could predict DCI occurrence.
Does non-invasive monitoring of systemic cardiovascular responses (changes in cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance) to clazosentan predict the occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Observational (n=48)
Does non-invasive monitoring of systemic cardiovascular responses (changes in cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance) to clazosentan predict the occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Non-invasive monitoring of systemic hemodynamic responses (specifically decreased cardiac output and increased systemic vascular resistance) during clazosentan therapy may help identify aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients at high risk of developing delayed cerebral ischemia.
Monitoring CO/SVR during clazosentan should not yet guide DCI risk assessment in SAH; leaves open their predictive utility.
Background Clazosentan, an endothelin A receptor antagonist, reduces angiographic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH); however, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) can still develop. We investigated whether the systemic cardiovascular responses to clazosentan could predict the occurrence of DCI. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients with aneurysmal SAH treated with clazosentan. Cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were measured using a non-invasive finger-cuff hemodynamic monitor. Changes in CO and SVR (ΔCO and ΔSVR) were defined as differences between post- and pre-clazosentan administration. Results DCI occurred in seven patients (14.6%). Patients with DCI showed significantly lower ΔCO (-0.4 L/min vs 0.7 L/min, p = 0.014) and higher SVR (454 mmHg·min/L vs. -242 mmHg·min/L, p = 0.008) than those without DCI. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.817 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.660–0.974) for ΔCO and 0.794 (95% CI, 0.591–0.998) for ΔSVR. In multivariate logistic regression, the combined pattern of negative ΔCO and positive ΔSVR was independently associated with DCI after age adjustment (odds ratio 11.03, 95% CI 1.34-90.75, p = 0.026). Conclusions These exploratory findings raise the possibility that non-invasive monitoring of systemic hemodynamic responses may help identify the patients at high risk of DCI after SAH during clazosentan therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sato et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=48). Combined negative ΔCO and positive ΔSVR in response to clazosentan vs. Other hemodynamic response patterns to clazosentan was evaluated on Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) (OR 11.03, 95% CI 1.34-90.75, p=0.026). A combined pattern of negative ΔCO and positive ΔSVR after clazosentan was independently associated with delayed cerebral ischemia (OR 11.03, 95% CI 1.34-90.75, p=0.026).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: