Key result
Mechanical thrombectomy is linked to ~3.5-fold higher odds of favorable 2-week functional outcomes in active cancer.
Why the study?
Evaluating mechanical thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke and active cancer is challenging because cancer-related mortality substantially confounds conventional functional outcomes.
Does mechanical thrombectomy improve the distribution of modified Rankin Scale scores at 2 weeks in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke and active cancer?
Cohort (n=72)
Does mechanical thrombectomy improve the distribution of modified Rankin Scale scores at 2 weeks in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke and active cancer?
Odds Ratio: 3.48 (95% CI 1.22–9.97)
p-value: p=0.020
Mechanical thrombectomy is significantly associated with improved early (2-week) functional outcomes in patients presenting with large vessel occlusion stroke and active cancer.
BACKGROUND: Evaluating mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) and active cancer (AC) is challenging because cancer-related mortality substantially affects conventional functional outcomes. This study aimed to assess the association between MT and early functional outcomes while minimizing the confounding impact of cancer-related death. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with LVOS and AC between January 2016 and December 2024. Patients were categorized into MT and non-MT groups. The primary outcome was the distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 2 weeks, analyzed using ordinal logistic regression. A sensitivity analysis excluding patients who died from cancer progression within 2 weeks of stroke onset was also performed. LVOS was defined as ischemic stroke with occlusion of the intra- or extracranial internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery (M1 or M2 segments), or basilar artery. RESULTS: Among 72 patients with LVOS and AC (median age, 76 years; 36 women), 32 (44%) underwent MT (28 MT alone, and 4 MT procedures combined with intravenous thrombolysis), whereas 3 patients in the non-MT group received intravenous thrombolysis alone. At 2 weeks, MT was significantly associated with a favorable shift in mRS distribution (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-9.97; p = 0.020). In a sensitivity analysis excluding cancer-related deaths, this association remained significant, with a larger effect size (adjusted OR, 6.21, 95% CI, 1.89-20.47; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: MT was associated with improved early functional outcomes in patients with LVOS and AC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomari et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Large vessel occlusion stroke and active cancer (n=72). Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) vs. Non-MT was evaluated on Distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 2 weeks (adjusted OR 3.48, 95% CI 1.22-9.97, p=0.020). Mechanical thrombectomy was associated with a favorable shift in 2-week mRS distribution in patients with large vessel occlusion and active cancer (adjusted OR 3.48; 95% CI 1.22-9.97; p=0.020).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: